{"id":518,"date":"2016-01-31T09:30:47","date_gmt":"2016-01-31T08:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/?post_type=publication&p=518"},"modified":"2025-09-10T11:20:22","modified_gmt":"2025-09-10T09:20:22","slug":"from-the-ecj-to-the-ecthr-and-back-again-the-european-regime-of-restrictive-measures-imposed-by-the-un-security-council","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/publication\/from-the-ecj-to-the-ecthr-and-back-again-the-european-regime-of-restrictive-measures-imposed-by-the-un-security-council\/","title":{"rendered":"From The ECJ to the ECtHR and back again: the European regime of restrictive measures imposed by the UN Security Council"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Extrait<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ce document vise \u00e0 montrer comment l\u2019approche adopt\u00e9e par la CJE dans l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00a0Kadi<\/em>\u00a0a influenc\u00e9 la jurisprudence de la Cour europ\u00e9enne des droits de l\u2019homme\u00a0en ce qui concerne les mesures relatives au gel des avoirs impos\u00e9es par le Conseil de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des Nations unies. Cette interaction a encourag\u00e9 une approche commune que les deux organes adoptent encore aujourd\u2019hui en mati\u00e8re d\u2019application des droits de l\u2019homme concernant le droit\u00a0\u00e0 un proc\u00e8s \u00e9quitable en Europe, m\u00eame si cela pourrait signifier la non application de certaines r\u00e9solutions contraignantes du Conseil de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des Nations unies. En r\u00e9alit\u00e9, la solution de l\u2019affaire\u00a0Kadi\u00a0<\/em>par la CJE est demand\u00e9e par la Convention europ\u00e9enne des droits de l’Homme en ce qui concerne l\u2019affaire\u00a0Nada<\/em>\u00a0qui \u00e0 son tour sera mentionn\u00e9 par la CJE dans l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00a0Kadi II<\/em>, permettant ainsi d\u2019envisager l\u2019adoption de cette solution comme le r\u00e9sultat plut\u00f4t positif d’un travail d’\u00e9quipe ax\u00e9 sur le dialogue et l\u2019influence r\u00e9ciproque.<\/p>\n

Par ailleurs, cette influence r\u00e9ciproque\u00a0devrait \u00eatre prise en consid\u00e9ration dans la perspective de l’avis n\u00e9gatif \u00e9mis par la CJE en d\u00e9cembre 2014 en ce qui concerne l\u2019adh\u00e9sion de l\u2019UE \u00e0 la Convention europ\u00e9enne des droits de l’Homme. En effet, alors que de nombreux sp\u00e9cialistes ont th\u00e9oris\u00e9 une \u201cconstitutionnalisation\u201d multi-niveaux de la protection juridique \u00e0 l’\u00e9chelle europ\u00e9enne du syst\u00e8me des droits de l\u2019homme en ce qui concerne l\u2019adh\u00e9sion, il n’existe plus aujourd’hui le moindre argument juridique permettant de justifier ce point de vue. Les deux juridictions, au contraire, se sont engag\u00e9es \u00e0 garantir le m\u00eame niveau\u00a0de protection des droits de l\u2019homme en Europe gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 une harmonisation de leurs d\u00e9cisions, en vue d\u2019assurer le meilleur niveau possible de protection de ce type de droits en Europe, sans pour autant produire aucune \u201cverticalisation\u201d ni aucun changement en ce qui concerne le cadre institutionnel europ\u00e9en. Ce faisant, ils ont circonscrit les questions ayant trait aux droits humains \u00e0 l’\u00e9chelle supranational\/international pour \u00e9viter\u00a0toute possibilit\u00e9 de contamination par les juridictions nationales dans des questions similaires.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n

This paper aims to demonstrate how the approach undertaken by the ECJ in the\u00a0Kadi I<\/em>\u00a0judgment influenced the jurisprudence of the ECtHR on asset freezing measures imposed by the UN Security Council. This interaction produced a common approach that the two bodies are still adopting today with regard to the application of due process rights in Europe, even though this could mean the non application of some UN security Council binding resolutions. In fact, the solution of the ECJ\u00a0Kadi I<\/em>\u00a0case is heavily relied upon by the ECtHR in the\u00a0Nada<\/em>\u00a0case, which will be cited in turn by the ECJ in the\u00a0Kadi II<\/em>\u00a0ruling, permitting to conceive this contamination as the successful result of a team work based on dialogue and mutual leverage.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, this mutual influence should be considered in the perspective of the negative opinion issued by the ECJ on December 2014 about the accession of the EU to the ECtHR.\u00a0 In fact, while many scholars theorized a multi-level “constitutionalization” of the European legal protection of Human Rights systems in the perspective of accession, today there is no legal argument that can justify this vision anymore. The two courts, instead, are committed to guarantee the same level of human rights protection in Europe through the harmonization of their decisions, aiming at the higher level of safeguard of this kind of rights in Europe, without pursuing any verticalization or change in the European institutional framework. While doing so, the two judicial bodies kept the questions related to human rights at a supranational\/international level, averting the hazard of the delivery of similar issues by national courts.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Acc\u00e8s au texte – Access to full text<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/form>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"template":"","publication_tax":[47],"class_list":["post-518","publication","type-publication","status-publish","hentry","publication_tax-working-paper"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/518\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":520,"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/518\/revisions\/520"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publication_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication_tax?post=518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}