{"id":527,"date":"2016-01-31T09:34:51","date_gmt":"2016-01-31T08:34:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/?post_type=publication&#038;p=527"},"modified":"2025-09-10T11:20:10","modified_gmt":"2025-09-10T09:20:10","slug":"the-dialogue-between-the-ecj-and-the-efta-court-from-the-perspective-of-the-homogeneity-principle","status":"publish","type":"publication","link":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/publication\/the-dialogue-between-the-ecj-and-the-efta-court-from-the-perspective-of-the-homogeneity-principle\/","title":{"rendered":"The dialogue between the ECJ and the EFTA Court from the perspective of the homogeneity principle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The paper focuses on the legal solutions and factors that make the dialogue between the EFTA Court and the ECJ effective. One of them is the willingness of these two European courts to ensure the coherence and homogeneity of the EEA legal space. Apart from this decisive factor, the effective dialogue is also reinforced thanks to others legal solutions like the interventions and observations submitted by the European Commission and the EFTA Surveillance Authority.<\/p>\n<p>As cooperation and mutual understanding between the ECJ and the EFTA Court are effective and ensure the coherence of their jurisprudence, the paper is also an attempt at answering the question whether making it possible for the European Commission and a body of an international organisation (the EFTA Surveillance Authority) to submit observations can be useful on a large scale. With the European legal space expanding and EU law having an impact as far as in third countries under the principle of integration without membership, the question arises whether the practice of intervening and submitting observations could be used as a factor which facilitates the dialogue between the ECJ and courts of EU neighbouring countries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Extrait<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>La vis\u00e9e de cet article est d\u2019\u00e9tudier des solutions juridiques et des facteurs qui aident \u00e0 assurer un dialogue efficace entre la CJUE et la Cour AELE. L&#8217;un d&#8217;entre eux est la volont\u00e9 de ces deux juridictions europ\u00e9ennes de garantir la coh\u00e9rence et l&#8217;homog\u00e9n\u00e9it\u00e9 de l&#8217;espace juridique de l&#8217;EEE. En dehors de ce facteur d\u00e9cisif, l&#8217;efficacit\u00e9 du dialogue est \u00e9galement renforc\u00e9e par d&#8217;autres solutions juridiques, par exemple des interventions et des observations pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es par la Commission et l&#8217;Autorit\u00e9 de surveillance de l&#8217;AELE.<\/p>\n<p>Puisque la collaboration et l\u2019entente mutuelle entre la CJUE et la Cour AELE sont efficaces et assurent la coh\u00e9rence de la jurisprudence des deux juridictions, l\u2019article tente \u00e9galement de r\u00e9pondre si le mod\u00e8le de la collaboration dans le cadre de l&#8217;AELE, et notamment, la possibilit\u00e9 pour la Commission et pour l&#8217;Autorit\u00e9 de surveillance AELE de pr\u00e9senter leurs observations, peut s\u2019av\u00e9rer utile \u00e0 plus grande \u00e9chelle. Comme l\u2019espace juridique europ\u00e9en continue de s\u2019\u00e9largir, et puisque le droit communautaire exerce une influence grandissante sur les pays tiers en cours du processus de l&#8217;int\u00e9gration sans adh\u00e9sion, la question qui s\u2019impose est de savoir si la pratique d&#8217;intervenir et de pr\u00e9senter des observations pourrait devenir un facteur facilitant le dialogue entre la CJUE et les juridictions des pays voisins de l\u2019UE.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><a title=\"Geneva JMWP 10-Kawka.pdf\" href=\"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Geneva_JMWP_10-Kawka.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Acc\u00e8s au texte &#8211; Access to full text<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","publication_tax":[47],"class_list":["post-527","publication","type-publication","status-publish","hentry","publication_tax-working-paper"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publication"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/527\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":529,"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication\/527\/revisions\/529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"publication_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceje.meig.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publication_tax?post=527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}